Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1

Christopher L. Morrow christopher.morrow at
Tue Jul 11 18:14:03 UTC 2006

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, WONG, Yuen-Fung wrote:

> Sometimes earlier this year someone announced this 128/1 and caused
> heavy loading to our routers to rebuild the CEF.  Would anyone filter
> out this route (and other similar routes such as 0/1, 128/1, 0/2, 64/2,
> .... up to /4, for example) as bogus routes?

Do you not prefix-list customers? That'd have solved this, eh?

More information about the NANOG mailing list