Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal

Florian Weimer fw at
Tue Jul 11 16:34:55 UTC 2006

* Fergie:

> I disagree with your statement on NAT end-points not being "publicly
> accessible" -- that's certainly not true, and a myth that needs to be
> finally killed.

>From a security point of view, they are still accessible.  From an
operational point of view, they are not, at least not on the original
IP layer, and if you aren't using 1:1 NAT.

Nevertheless, I think that the "publicly accessible" criterion is
flawed because it is too murky.  But something similar is necessary to
implement the corporate networks exception.

More information about the NANOG mailing list