Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1

Patrick W. Gilmore patrick at
Tue Jul 11 02:00:11 UTC 2006

On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:48 PM, WONG, Yuen-Fung wrote:

> Sometimes earlier this year someone announced this 128/1 and caused  
> heavy loading to our routers to rebuild the CEF.
> Would anyone filter out this route (and other similar routes such  
> as 0/1, 128/1, 0/2, 64/2, .... up to /4, for example) as bogus routes?

Would anyone not filter those routes?  Why wouldn't you filter to /7?

Actually, I take that back.  Why wouldn't you just get a feed from  
Cymru <> ??


More information about the NANOG mailing list