So -- what did happen to Panix?

Fri Jan 27 16:54:49 UTC 2006

On Jan 27, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:

>> seems to me that certified validation of prefix ownership and as
>> path are the only real way out of these problems that does not
>> teach us the 42 reasons we use a *dynamic* protocol.
>
> Wouldn't a well-operated network of IRRs used by 95% of
> network operators be able to meet all three of your
> requirements?

Maybe I missed something, but didn't Verio say the prefix was in  
their internal registry, and that's why it was accepted.

IOW: It didn't solve this problem.  So I guess we're discussing the  
other 5%?

-- 
TTFN,
patrick