So -- what did happen to Panix?

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Thu Jan 26 06:22:01 UTC 2006


On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:54:30 +0200, Pekka Savola said:
> It'd be darn difficult to engineer a solution that would end up being 
> deployed in any reasonable time if we don't know the requirements 
> first.

Fortunately, when we know the requirements and engineer a solution, deployment
is straightforward.  RFC2827, for example, has a stellar deployment record.

In other words - what is the business case for deploying this proposed
solution?  I may be able to get things deployed at $WORK by arguing that
it's The Right Thing To Do, but at most shops an ROI calculation needs
to be attached to get movement....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20060126/04da49cf/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list