Split flows across Domains

Christopher L. Morrow christopher.morrow at verizonbusiness.com
Tue Jan 24 18:29:44 UTC 2006



On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Joe Abley wrote:

>
> On 24-Jan-2006, at 12:07, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
>
> > He said "via two different autonomous domains", which I took to mean
> > two upstreams... and my understanding is that (on ciscos anyway)
> > you're talking per-packet, not per-flow load balancing.
>
> If you can get two candidate routes for the same destination into the
> FIB, then you'll get per-flow load balancing as long as CEF is
> running, no?

that was my thought... and yes, it could get ugly for tcp services. Why
would you knowningly induce this complication?



More information about the NANOG mailing list