Marc, care to respond?

Mon Jan 16 23:11:47 UTC 2006

I agree that in fact it seems that Go daddy followed their procedures to the
letter as they are supposed to do. The gentlemen in "The President's office"
was very concise in his assessment of the issue, AND his repeated attempts
to take the issue home to closure. I used to work for a guy that ran a
datacenter in a similar way, and had to make calls on his behalf to carriers
to plead my case, after emails to the principle went unanswered. I can feel
the pain that Marc was under in his pleas, and hope that I have never been
so whiney, or belligerent with my carriers. After reading his home page I
see there is a bit of leaning towards aggrandizement, so with a balance to
all: Marc would you care to respond now that our feet are out of the fire?
The repeated use of the phrase that an entire datacenter is turned off is
rather distressing, given that all that was turned off where the links to
the primary name servers? We operate in a datacenter, and provide name
services to our clients. Often, we have to shut down, remove from network, a
non-managed server, that is spewing crap. Usually we are the ones to
discover this, but if our carriers report this, we have to respond quickly,
that is the business we are all in. Marc, are you the technical contact for
the domain, or a customer? If you are the technical contact, I hope that you
will be more careful, or make your email the primary technical contact for
the domain. If you are just a friend, and I am guessing customer, for this
domain, RUN. I use Go daddy, and the same procedures that you where trying
to circumvent, are the same procedures that they would have gone through to
notify the POC.   

Mark D. Bodley

Senior Partner,

Cyrix Systems

954-537-9499

m at cyrixsys.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20060116/9930d288/attachment.html>