Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs
surfer at mauigateway.com
Mon Feb 27 18:47:32 UTC 2006
> --On February 25, 2006 11:04:12 AM -0500 "Patrick W.
> Gilmore" <patrick at ianai.net> wrote:
> > On Feb 24, 2006, at 9:03 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> >> I have 2 core routers (CR) and 3 access routers (AR)
> >> currently connected point-to-point where each AR
> connects to >> each CR for a total of 6 ckts. Now someone
> has decided to >> connect them with Gig-E. I was
> wondering about the benefits >> or disadvantages of
> keeping the ckts each in their own >> individual LANs or
> tying them all into one VLAN for a >> "Transit LAN" as
> those folks that decided on going to Gig-E >> aren't doing
> any logical network architecting (is that a >> real
> In my experience either solution has tradeoffs and the
> correct one depends greatly on your traffic patterns.
> Having said that, what I find causes most of the problems
> in either solution is when the Layer 3 topology starts to
> diverge from the Layer 2 topology.
Apologies for the late response, I had to do an unexpected
outer island trip and got back late last night.
I am just using OSPF area zero between the CRs and ARs. So,
it's full mesh over a LAN if I do the "transit LAN". Is
that what you're referring to? Could you elaborate?
More information about the NANOG