a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
Joe Abley
jabley at isc.org
Fri Feb 17 05:13:48 UTC 2006
On 16-Feb-2006, at 13:32, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> JA> I get the feeling that there's a lot of solutions-designing
> going on in this
> JA> thread without the benefit of prior problem-stating.
>
> Problem:
>
> Consumers want to multihome.
That sentence needs profound expansion before it's going to be
reasonable to assess any proposed solution.
(Why do they want to multi-home? What do they hope to achieve?
Redundancy? Load sharing? What trade-offs are reasonable, e.g. with
respect to the stability of individual sessions across re-homing
events? In a transaction carried between two hosts, do clients and
servers have different requirements?)
We tried to catch a reasonable number of motivations in RFC 3582, but
I bet we missed plenty.
Joe
More information about the NANOG
mailing list