a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
John A. Kilpatrick
john at hypergeek.net
Thu Feb 16 02:51:16 UTC 2006
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> Stop. Examine. Think. Then respond.
[...]
> Coop ASNs/IP save ASNs and aggregate routes. Full stop.
Maybe I missed it, but is there something in your solution that keeps
dual-homed leaves from having to renumber when changing ISPs? In your
concept, is there some "ownership" of the address space on the part of the
customer? I know that being able to swing to a new provider (due one of a
hundred reasons, including Layer 8 manangement decisions) without having
to renumber or suffer significant downtime is one of the things that makes
dual-homing appealing.
--
John A. Kilpatrick
john at hypergeek.net Email| http://www.hypergeek.net/
john-page at hypergeek.net Text pages| ICQ: 19147504
remember: no obstacles/only challenges
More information about the NANOG
mailing list