a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
paul at clubi.ie
Wed Feb 15 23:41:15 UTC 2006
<aside: text below seems to reply to me specifically, but for some
strange reason you decided to strip my address from your reply.>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> BTW, Paul, FixedOrbit reports 701 as having ~1500 peers and
> downstreams. As interconnected as even they are, that's still a far
> cry from the full-mesh O(N^2) situation you seemed to suggest.
I'm not sure what bearing any specific number has on O(n^2)
behaviour. However, if you want to look at specific numbers, plug
'10' in there, then try '20'.
Paul Jakma paul at clubi.ie paul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Avoid reality at all costs.
More information about the NANOG