a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)

Paul Jakma paul at clubi.ie
Wed Feb 15 23:41:15 UTC 2006

<aside: text below seems to reply to me specifically, but for some 
strange reason you decided to strip my address from your reply.>

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Edward B. DREGER wrote:

> BTW, Paul, FixedOrbit reports 701 as having ~1500 peers and 
> downstreams. As interconnected as even they are, that's still a far 
> cry from the full-mesh O(N^2) situation you seemed to suggest.

I'm not sure what bearing any specific number has on O(n^2) 
behaviour. However, if you want to look at specific numbers, plug 
'10' in there, then try '20'.

Paul Jakma	paul at clubi.ie	paul at jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Avoid reality at all costs.

More information about the NANOG mailing list