SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs

Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.lists at
Fri Feb 10 03:49:48 UTC 2006

On 2/10/06, Alain Hebert <ahebert at> wrote:
>     For APNIC, we also includes all their peers up-to (if possible) to a
> ARIN one.  But we only do that on extreme case of network flooding.
>     (No sense on wasting operator time on spam related incidents)

I agree you have a problem there - but try using something like's sbl and xbl first.  And then a few other well chosen
blocklists (not the "block all traffic from a country" variety at all)

You wont get any productive results from blocking apnic space the way you do.


More information about the NANOG mailing list