SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs
ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Feb 10 03:49:48 UTC 2006
On 2/10/06, Alain Hebert <ahebert at pubnix.net> wrote:
> For APNIC, we also includes all their peers up-to (if possible) to a
> ARIN one. But we only do that on extreme case of network flooding.
> (No sense on wasting operator time on spam related incidents)
I agree you have a problem there - but try using something like
spamhaus.org's sbl and xbl first. And then a few other well chosen
blocklists (not the "block all traffic from a country" variety at all)
You wont get any productive results from blocking apnic space the way you do.
More information about the NANOG