CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...

Christopher L. Morrow christopher.morrow at verizonbusiness.com
Wed Feb 8 03:07:58 UTC 2006


On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Randy Bush wrote:

>
> > I'm interested in responses to this ...  MPLS is still a four letter word
> > ..  :)
>
> <http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2006-02/converged.html>
>

here's me hiding this article from 'management' who are again chasing the
'converged' network :( In some cases it appears convergence makes some
sense, I think often though (in my very humble experience) it's more of a
buzzword-compliance test than anything else. In the case which kicked off
this discussion I was struck that perhaps an older and simpler solution
(ipsec vpn and some strict firewalling) would provide the seperation
necessary over a single network connection.

Oh the fun of converged networks, mpls private vpn's :)



More information about the NANOG mailing list