jcurran at mail.com
Thu Dec 28 20:14:34 UTC 2006
At 3:03 PM -0500 12/28/06, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>FE goes to colo (where he has been removed from the access list).
>Shows ID to guards, who knew him well, and is let in, list or no list.
>The FE got the money he wanted. The client got their router back.
>I am not sure if the guards were reprimanded or not.
Client informs colo provider that they were negligent by allowing the
theft, and deducts the replacement cost from next invoice?
More information about the NANOG