DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware)
Matt Ghali
matt at snark.net
Sun Dec 10 21:14:15 UTC 2006
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Daniel Golding wrote:
> Folks should also look at some of the DNS appliances (I know, this is "extra
> hardware"). Although the usually run BIND, they tend to be fairly optimized
> and have extra management functionality that may help with the rate limiting
> (if not, its probably a feature request that the vendors would entertain
> rapidly, as there's some pretty intense competition). Some folks to talk to -
> Infoblox and Bluecat.
I'm not sure what you mean by "optimized" here, but I suspect that
the only part optimized is the user interface for configuring
per-client policies that still do not scale, but I would be glad to
be proven wrong.
> If you have really large DNS rate requirements, I'd
> consider talking to Nominum.
I agree with you there; but that's sort of a given :)
matto
--matt at snark.net------------------------------------------<darwin><
Moral indignation is a technique to endow the idiot with dignity.
- Marshall McLuhan
More information about the NANOG
mailing list