SORBS Contact
Allan Poindexter
apoindex at aoc.nrao.edu
Thu Aug 10 05:17:12 UTC 2006
william> In the way you describe it any spam filter is bad any spam
william> filter manufacturer should go to jail...
Manufacturer? No. It is perfectly permissible for a recipient to run
a filter over his own mail if he wishes.
Jail? Not what I said. I said postal workers couldn't get away with
this behavior. The laws governing email are different. BUT:
They aren't as different as is generally believed. Go read the
ECPA sometime.
Being legal isn't the same thing as being moral. The world would
be a better place if people started worrying about doing what is
right rather than only avoiding what will get them in jail.
If I seem testy about this it is because I am. A friend of mine with
cancer died recently. I learned later she sent me email befoe she
died. It did not reach me because some arrogant fool thought he knew
better than me what I wanted to read. And it isn't the first time or
the only sender with which I have had this problem. I have had plenty
of users with the same complaint as well.
I have in the past considered this antispam stuff "ill advised" or
"something I oppose". Expect me to fight it tooth and nail from now
on.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list