SORBS Contact

Matthew Sullivan matthew at sorbs.net
Wed Aug 9 22:20:18 UTC 2006


Allan Poindexter wrote:
> The functionality of my email is still almost completely intact.  The
> only time it isn't is when some antispam kook somewhere decides he
> knows better than me what I want to read.  Spam is manageable problem
> without the self appointed censors.  Get over it and move on.
>  
>   
Interesting comment - so would you consider as it is my network, that I 
should not be allowed to impose these 'draconian' methods and perhaps I 
shouldn't be allowed to censor traffic to and from my networks?  Should 
you not be allowed to censor my traffic going to your network (if any)?  
The "self appointed censors" are not self appointed - they produce lists 
the admins of their own networks choose what traffic to accept or deny, 
if they choose to accept or deny based on a third party it doe not 
automatically make that person a "self appointed censor".

Regards,

Mat



More information about the NANOG mailing list