Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism
Robert E.Seastrom
rs at seastrom.com
Wed Apr 12 14:10:47 UTC 2006
"M. David Leonard" <mdl at equinox.shaysnet.com> writes:
> What is to prevent a network from providing unjittered NTP to its
> downstream clients/customers BUT jittered NTP to outsiders? How is this
> different from providing up-to-the-millisecond stock exchange data to
> paying customers but delaying the same data provided to the general public
> by some time period?
"All quotes and all NTP ticks are delayed 15 minutes" is an amusing concept.
> Are we constrained by fear of litigation from
> taking appropriate pro-active measures to protect services from abuse and
> from discriminating between legitimate and questionable requests for data
> from our own servers? Is it time to bail out of the Internet business?
Listen to Paul; he's a past master at defending against
gratuitous/stupid lawsuits. You're under no obligation to provide the
service, but actively providing bad info could be construed as a tort,
and defending/filing lawsuits, like horse racing (owning the horses,
not going to the races), is a sport for the super-well-heeled.
---Rob
More information about the NANOG
mailing list