abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00)

Tue Apr 4 14:34:11 UTC 2006

On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:43:20 EDT, John Payne said:

> Bah, someone else mentioned them just recently.  From my point of  
> view, all they seem to do is scattershot any addresses they can find  
> that's even remotely related.

Given the fact that the type of places that the PIRT people need to notify
are the kind of places that also have non-functional abuse@ addresses,
do you have an actual *better* suggestion?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20060404/9a607223/attachment.sig>