AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant"

Sun Apr 2 15:58:25 UTC 2006

On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Simon Lockhart wrote:

>
> On Sat Apr 01, 2006 at 01:26:51PM -0600, Frank Bulk wrote:
>> The majority of U.S.-based IP TV deployments are not using MPEG-4
>
> Agreed. However, I'd say that any IPTV provider currently using MPEG2 would
> be planning a migration to MPEG4/H.264 - half the bandwidth means double the
> channels.
>
>> in fact,
>> you would be hard-pressed to find an MPEG-4 capable STB working with
>> middleware.
>
> I disagree. There are several MPEG4 capable STB available now, and they all
> have support of middleware vendors.
>
>> SD MPEG-2 runs around ~4 Mbps today and HD MPEG-2 is ~19 Mbps. With ADSL2+
>> you can get up to 24 Mbps per home on very short loops, but if you look at
>> the loop length/rate graphs, you'll see that even with VDSL2 only the very
>> short loops will have sufficient capacity for multiple HD streams.  FTTP/H
>> is inevitable.
>
> Anyone looking to do HD will be looking at H.264, and looking to bring the
> bandwidth requirement down to 8-10Mbps. That is certainly more practical with
> ADSL2+ deployments (unless you want more than one STB per DSL).

US homes with digital cable or satellite typically do have more than one 
STB at this point simply becasue you need one for each TV...

> Simon
> (Currently working on an H.264 IPTV deployment)
>

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Jaeggli  	       Unix Consulting 	       joelja at darkwing.uoregon.edu
GPG Key Fingerprint:     5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2