Weird DNS issues for domains

Thu Sep 29 23:51:44 UTC 2005

In article <A310E761-5459-440B-BA92-E160A45550AB at crocker.com> you write:
>
>>
>> I just tested it from a Verizon DSL host and it worked.
>>
>> You might want to consider reading RFC 2182 though, particularly the
>> part about geographically diverse nameservers.
>
>Yeah, yeah,  that is overrated.  If my site goes dark and my DNS goes  
>down it doesn't really matter as the bandwidth and the web server  
>will also be down.  Having a live DNS server in another part of the  
>country won't help if the access routers handling the traffic for the  
>T1 to the school is also down.
>
>Geographically diverse name servers sounds great in theory but for  
>this application it won't gain any redundancy.

	People say this but then they don't see the impact of not
	having DNS servers available.

	The DNS was designed with the idea that atleast one of the
	nameservers for a zone would always be reachable.  A zone
	that is unreachable results in the caching servers using
	up resouces at 1000 times the normal rate.  Milli-seconds
	to tens of seconds.

	Mark