multi homing pressure
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Wed Oct 19 16:03:22 UTC 2005
On Oct 19, 2005, at 11:54 AM, Todd Vierling wrote:
>>>> "Gartner said every location that requires mission-critical
>>>> internet connectivity, including externally hosted
>>>> websites, should be multi-homed"
>>>
>>> 200k routes, here we come!
>>
>> it is just good common sense though, eh?
>
> Well, not necessarily.
>
> Tier-2s should be given much more credit than they typically are in
> write-ups like this. When a customer is single homed to a tier-2
> that has
> multiple tier-1 upstreams, and uses a delegated netblock from the
> tier-2's
> aggregations, that means one less ASN and one or more less routes
> in the
> global table.
>
> It's a Good Thing(tm).
For you.
For the customer with an Internet "mission critical app", being tied
to a Tier 2 has it's own set of problems, which might actually be
worse than being tied to a Tier 1.
The Internet is a business tool. If providers do not meet business
requirements, providers will not be supported. Period.
If 200K routes, or more ASNs, or small customers multihoming, or
stuff like that scares you, find another line of work. (Hint-hint to
the v6 fanatics.)
--
TTFN,
patrick
More information about the NANOG
mailing list