And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news)
Tony Li
tony.li at tony.li
Tue Oct 18 21:05:12 UTC 2005
Daniel,
> But wasn't that the rationale for originally putting the kitchen
> sink into IPv6, rather than fixing the address length issue?
The stated rationale was to fix the address length issue.
> I think we missed a lot of opportunities.
Amen.
> We're 10 years on, and talking about whether there will need to be
> more than one massive pain of migration, because the kitchen sink
> didn't take into account multihoming.
More generally because we were unwilling to make changes to the
routing architecture.
> Now we're talking about a solution that appear to be an even worse
> Rube Goldberg than token ring source-route bridging.
No one has proposed anything that is as bad as the exponential
traffic explosion caused by explorers.
> Moore will likely have to continue to produce the solution.
What happens if he can't? Silicon technology *is* topping out. What
happens to v6 if every single household and business on the planet
decides to multihome?
Tony
More information about the NANOG
mailing list