IPv6 news

Mon Oct 17 16:56:07 UTC 2005

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yo Michael!

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote:

> Here, the suggestion is that netblocks should
> be allocated to cities, not to providers. Within
> a city, providers would get a subset of the city
> address block to meet their local infrastructure
> needs. They would interconnect with each other
> a local exchange points to exchange local traffic

And who is going to force the ISPs to interconnect at the city level?
For competitive reasons there is no peering in my city.  The nearest
peering points are several hundred miles away, in different directions,
and even those are not shared in common by the local ISPs.

RGDS
GARY
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDU9eq8KZibdeR3qURAnBfAKC4ZBCUrGq9HgW80FJxIGqfbR7mowCgi4GD
ykujmYnq/FPv6MA1nKdf49A=
=aUG/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----