And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news)
Joe Abley
jabley at isc.org
Sun Oct 16 14:55:38 UTC 2005
On 16-Oct-2005, at 03:37, David Conrad wrote:
>> Shifting the NAT to end system removed the objection to NAT, tho
>> it's not entirely clear why. Shifting NAT to the end system also
>> happened to simplify the entire solution as well.
>
> Except for the part about having to rewrite all existing
> implementations to take full advantage of the technology.
Thought experiment: how many different software vendors need to
change their shipping IPv6 code in order for some new feature like
shim6 to be 80% deployed in the server and client communities of hosts?
I'm thinking it's probably less than 5, but I'd be interested to hear
opinions to the contrary.
Joe
More information about the NANOG
mailing list