# > but when similar things were proposed at other meetings, somebody always # > said "no! we have to have end-to- end, and if we'd wanted # > nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4." # # Is VJ compression considered a violation of the "end-to-end" principle? # # Or perhaps I misunderstand (yet again). vj is a framing protocol. IP goes in, IP comes out. univerality is retained.