On Oct 15, 2005, at 9:08 PM, Paul Vixie wrote: > but when similar things were proposed > at other meetings, somebody always said "no! we have to have end-to- > end, > and if we'd wanted nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4." Hmm. Is VJ compression considered a violation of the "end-to-end" principle? Or perhaps I misunderstand (yet again). Rgds, -drc