IPv6 news

Sat Oct 15 19:29:02 UTC 2005

> So the IETF identified 4 reasons to multihome.  Of those 4, shim6  
> ignores at least 2 of them (operational policy and cost), and so  
> far as I can see glosses over load sharing.

If you have a solution that satisfies all requirements, you should  
contribute it.  Shim6 is indeed a partial solution to the stated  
requirements.  There was no tractable solution found to all  
requirements, and to not solve any of the issues was seen as  
basically fatal.

Tony