IPv6 news

Thu Oct 13 19:38:34 UTC 2005

On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:26:12 +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ said:

> 16  otm6-gate1.iij.net  418.808 ms  517.862 ms otm6-bb0.iij.net  416 ms
> 17  plt001ix06.iij.net  433.301 ms plt001ix06.iij.net  426.364 ms  454.844
> ms
> 18  plt001ix06.iij.net  473.956 ms  456.72 ms plt6-gate1.iij.net  717.541 ms
> 19  sl-bb1v6-rly-t-22.sprintv6.net  422.121 ms plt6-gate1.iij.net  433.742
> ms  504.335 ms
> 20  sl-bb1v6-rly-t-22.sprintv6.net  429.331 ms  445.961 ms
> sl-s1v6-nyc-t-1000.sprintv6.net  439.238 ms
> 21  sl-bb1v6-sto-t-102.sprintv6.net  591.344 ms
> sl-s1v6-nyc-t-1000.sprintv6.net  423.258 ms  600.439 ms
> 22  * * *

That looks a lot like my traceroute6 (except that when I tried it, the next
hop was working).  Is it just me, or is this saying that 2001:440::/32 isn't
peered in enough places (since for both my eastern US location and Jordi's
London location, the route points off to iij.net)?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20051013/e03443bb/attachment.sig>