IPv6 news

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Thu Oct 13 06:45:30 UTC 2005


I will be happy to show them but what I know here comes only from the paper
that I've indicated a few week ago about the 6to4 relays. I just seen the
same comment from the author on the list ...

Anyway, the last time I attached a couple of small graphics with stats on
web servers, they were filtered by the list ...

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Joel Jaeggli <joelja at darkwing.uoregon.edu>
> Responder a: <owner-nanog at merit.edu>
> Fecha: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
> Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> CC: "nanog at merit.edu" <nanog at merit.edu>
> Asunto: Re: IPv6 news
> 
> 
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> 
>> 
>> As I know, BT and P2P (some apps), already are using IPv6 ;-)
> 
> show flow logs please.
> 
>> And in 6-12 months the new Vista will start replacing XP, with IPv6 enabled
>> by default. If you observe what is happening with XP and IPv6 NOT enabled by
>> default, you may guess what will happen and how many apps. developers will
>> take it seriously.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Jordi
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> De: Sean Figgins <sean at labrats.us>
>>> Responder a: <owner-nanog at merit.edu>
>>> Fecha: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:56:05 -0600 (MDT)
>>> Para: <nanog at nanog.org>
>>> Asunto: Re: IPv6 news
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote:
>>> 
>>>> addresses. But of those "few" many are those doing P2P sharing
>>>> especially with BitTorent and this application requires open port
>>>> on the user end, so in fact P2P and BT may prove to be the cornerstone
>>>> to getting wider use of IPv6 after we ran out of v4 space...
>>> 
>>> Both BT and other P2P protocols are perfectly happy behind NAT.  There are
>>> a few that seem to prefer that they have a non-natted address, or use some
>>> port forwarding.
>>> 
>>> Those applications will just need to be fixed if it becomes a common
>>> practive of handing out NAT addresses to customers.
>>> 
>>> I think the bigger problem would be that of a larger company running out
>>> of RFC 1918 space, for various reasons.
>>> 
>>>  -Sean
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ************************************
>> The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
>> 
>> Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
>> Information available at:
>> http://www.ipv6-es.com
>> 
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
>> confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
>> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
>> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
>> information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Joel Jaeggli          Unix Consulting         joelja at darkwing.uoregon.edu
> GPG Key Fingerprint:     5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
> 




************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Information available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.






More information about the NANOG mailing list