Cogent move without renumbering
William Allen Simpson
wsimpson at greendragon.com
Fri Oct 7 18:10:32 UTC 2005
William Allen Simpson wrote:
> However, we should assist everybody without an AS and at least /24 to
> move to Cogent without renumbering. That means the blocks should be
> reassigned. That requires registry assistance.
>
> To avoid routing table explosion, we probably need to identify adjacent
> blocks and encourage them to move to Cogent, too.
>
It seems to me that the recent discussion between Leo Bicknell and Lamar
Owen is relevant. A network partition affecting hundreds of thousands
(millions according to the Boston Globe article) is closely akin to a
natural disaster. In this case, an _unnatural_ disaster.
I remember presenting a paper at IETF over a decade ago about assigning
IP addresses to exchanges instead of carriers. That would allow rapid
failover, and promote competition.
Therefore, I propose that we identify those ISPs moving from Level3 to
Cogent that are also connected to an *IX. The IP block should be
reassigned by the registry to the IX.
We should encourage everybody else moving that requires a circuit change
to connect to an IX where Cogent is present.
That should help routing tables immensely!
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
More information about the NANOG
mailing list