Public Works Peering

James Spenceley james at iroute.org
Thu Oct 6 14:46:23 UTC 2005


> A consortium of companies using this NAP would engineer the network  
> since
> most times government officials have little clue on the engineering  
> side
> of things, nor would they understand it more than those already in the
> industry.

Having read this thread,

I'm going to assume most of the engineers who want to peer there, are  
no more qualified than said government officials.

> This NAP would be unbiased as to "my bgp tables are bigger than
> yours" arguments, and would pass traffic unbiased to most destinations
> without flaw.

the time of MLPA has long since passed, let it rest in peace.

> J. Oquendo

--
James



More information about the NANOG mailing list