Public Works Peering
James Spenceley
james at iroute.org
Thu Oct 6 14:46:23 UTC 2005
> A consortium of companies using this NAP would engineer the network
> since
> most times government officials have little clue on the engineering
> side
> of things, nor would they understand it more than those already in the
> industry.
Having read this thread,
I'm going to assume most of the engineers who want to peer there, are
no more qualified than said government officials.
> This NAP would be unbiased as to "my bgp tables are bigger than
> yours" arguments, and would pass traffic unbiased to most destinations
> without flaw.
the time of MLPA has long since passed, let it rest in peace.
> J. Oquendo
--
James
More information about the NANOG
mailing list