Cogent/Level 3 depeering
Warren Kumari
warren at kumari.net
Wed Oct 5 20:50:51 UTC 2005
On Oct 5, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> At 02:47 PM 05/10/2005, Douglas Dever wrote:
>
>
>> > fact remains that Cogent is not providing the service I'm paying
>> them
>> > for and they need to get it fixed.
>>
>> Really? As you already pointed out, your packets are reaching their
>> destination. So, they don't "need" to get anything "fixed."
>>
>
> I think what people are upset about is that you now have less
> redundancy now if you are a cogent transit customer. If I tell my
> customers, "I have 3 full transit links", I now have to put an *
> there. If my 2 non cogent links go down, I dont have a full
> visibility of the Internet. I see everything, except Level3. It
> becomes more acute if you have just 2 transit links-- Cogent and
> one other. What if your other provider has a lossy path to Level
> 3 ? You cant work around it by preferencing 174 3356
>
> ---Mike
You have always needed that asterisk, the only thing that changes is
the scale of things...
"3 full transit links" is really only marketing speak, the same thing
applies to "the full Internet" and "Tier <anything>".
I run Billy_Bobs_Florist.com[0]. Lets say I filter all routes from
your provider, or just your routes (don't ask me why, it's my
network...). Are you going to go after your provider and demand
credit from them because I have chosen to ignore some routes? No?
But now you no longer have "the full Internet"...
Or I run some huge "Tier 1" (shudders) and all of the fiber to
Singapore (on someone else's network) gets cut. You can no longer
reach "the full Internet" - do I owe you money? Ok, how about the
only T1 to some site that you feel like browsing to goes down? Now do
I owe you credit? But you no longer have "the full Internet", nor
"full routes".
Or lets say I run "Billy Bob ISP" ( a small ISP that buys
connectivity from only one place, ISP_X). You are a customer of ISP_X
and I now sell you a circuit and give you full tables (from my view).
Do you really have n + 1 "full transit links" now?
When you buy connectivity from a provider the only thing that you
really get any guarantee on is whatever is written on your contract
- and I would be very surprised if it says anything about reaching
all hosts connected to the Internet at all times[1]. Sure you have
some expectations of what they will provide (full tables will be some
large number of routes, they connect to a bunch of other networks,
they don't filter port 80 (or anything else for that matter)), but
unless your contract actually specifies all of this, you are on your
own. But don't worry, you do have some power in all this - you can
vote with your wallet...
Warren.
[0] Ok, so I don't really, but....
[1] If it does, I want whoever wrote your contract working for me....
--
There are only 10 types of people in this world -- those who
understand binary arithmetic and those who don't.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list