Cogent/Level 3 depeering
Jon Lewis
jlewis at lewis.org
Wed Oct 5 16:32:10 UTC 2005
In the end, both providers lose, as customers buy real Internet transit
from someone else.
OTOH, the industry as a whole probably gains. I have a client who's
massively overprovisioned, multihomed with multiple Ts each to 3 or 4
providers now after being bitten a couple years ago when singlehomed to
C&W and they depeered PSI. Funny that those PSI customers are getting
screwed again now.
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Christopher Woodfield wrote:
>
> Ah, the problem with playing chicken is what happens when neither player
> blinks...
>
> -C
>
> On Oct 5, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Vince Hoffman wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> A couple weeks later than expected, but as of Oct 5 02:51AM EDT it looks
>>> like 3356 and 174 are no longer reachable.
>>>
>>> lg.level3.net:
>>>
>>> Show Level 3 (Washington, DC) BGP routes for 38.9.51.20
>>>
>>> No matching routes found for 38.9.51.20.
>>>
>>> www.cogentco.com looking glass:
>>>
>>> Tracing the route to www.Level3.com (209.245.19.42)
>>>
>>> 1 f29.ba01.b005944-0.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.250.56.189) 4 msec 4
>>> msec 0 msec
>>> 2 * * *
>>> 3 * * *
>>>
>>> I guess the earlier reports of (3)'s lack of testicular fortitude may have
>>> been exagerated after all. :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It's sure causing a few headaches here.
>> (from level3 looking glass) Show Level 3 (London, England) BGP routes for
>> 38.9.51.20
>>
>> No matching routes found for 38.9.51.20
>>
>> As of 16:22 BST Level3 still seems to have no routes for cogent's space.
>> thats about 5 hours now.
>>
>>
>> Vince
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
>>> GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
More information about the NANOG
mailing list