[Latest draft of Internet regulation bill]
Steven M. Bellovin
smb at cs.columbia.edu
Mon Nov 14 16:22:02 UTC 2005
In message <Pine.GSO.4.58.0511141103370.27792 at clifden.donelan.com>, Sean Donela
n writes:
>
>On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Blaine Christian wrote:
>> We are talking about an infrastructure that does not lend itself very
>> well to market forces. In many places FFTH and/or DSL from a single
>> carrier are becoming the only options. I would not count a 500ms
>> satellite hop as an option <grin>.
>
>The cable industry claims 97% of the households passed in the US. Why
>don't you consider it an option?
>
Do they claim to pass 97% with two-way cable?
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
More information about the NANOG
mailing list