L3 having issues on the west coast?

Vicky Rode vickyr at socal.rr.com
Fri Nov 4 04:21:33 UTC 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

They could be possible rate-limiting it. That's why tools such as mtr
and others do not necessarily tell you the whole truth.


regards,
/virendra


Elijah Savage wrote:
> Jon Lewis wrote:
> 
> 
>>I was trying to get some IOS and compare a few images in FN, and found 
>>I cisco.com was being sluggish, and FN wouldn't load at all.
>>
>>                                           Packets               Pings
>>Hostname                                %Loss  Rcv  Snt  Last Best  
>>Avg  Worst
>>...
>> 6. ge-6-2-0.mp1.Orlando1.Level3.net       0%   44   44     5    4   
>>13    120
>> 7. ae-0-0.bbr1.SanJose1.Level3.net       14%   38   44    75   74   
>>75     77
>> 8. ge-11-1.ipcolo1.SanJose1.Level3.net   23%   34   44    75   75   
>>75     76
>> 9. p1-0.cisco.bbnplanet.net              10%   40   44    75   75   
>>81    160
>>10. sjce-dmzbb-gw1.cisco.com               0%   44   44    77   75   
>>82    292
>>11. sjck-dmzdc-gw2.cisco.com              25%   33   44    76   76   
>>76     77
>>12. www.cisco.com                         59%   18   44    76   76   
>>77     78
>>
>>That doesn't look right.  Anyone know what's going on out there?
>>
>>
> 
> I am not sure what is going on there, but Cisco has been this way for a 
> month or more for me. I do not have problems bringing up their website 
> but I do notice that ICMP packet loss to them has been horrible the last 
> month or so.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDauHNpbZvCIJx1bcRAnUQAJ9g/6HFPLH5XeKk14iiYxfNE+dsVQCfd7LJ
3ecLHsu0tJ8iDvzJJ9pOCaQ=
=r4me
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the NANOG mailing list