L3 having issues on the west coast?
Vicky Rode
vickyr at socal.rr.com
Fri Nov 4 04:21:33 UTC 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
They could be possible rate-limiting it. That's why tools such as mtr
and others do not necessarily tell you the whole truth.
regards,
/virendra
Elijah Savage wrote:
> Jon Lewis wrote:
>
>
>>I was trying to get some IOS and compare a few images in FN, and found
>>I cisco.com was being sluggish, and FN wouldn't load at all.
>>
>> Packets Pings
>>Hostname %Loss Rcv Snt Last Best
>>Avg Worst
>>...
>> 6. ge-6-2-0.mp1.Orlando1.Level3.net 0% 44 44 5 4
>>13 120
>> 7. ae-0-0.bbr1.SanJose1.Level3.net 14% 38 44 75 74
>>75 77
>> 8. ge-11-1.ipcolo1.SanJose1.Level3.net 23% 34 44 75 75
>>75 76
>> 9. p1-0.cisco.bbnplanet.net 10% 40 44 75 75
>>81 160
>>10. sjce-dmzbb-gw1.cisco.com 0% 44 44 77 75
>>82 292
>>11. sjck-dmzdc-gw2.cisco.com 25% 33 44 76 76
>>76 77
>>12. www.cisco.com 59% 18 44 76 76
>>77 78
>>
>>That doesn't look right. Anyone know what's going on out there?
>>
>>
>
> I am not sure what is going on there, but Cisco has been this way for a
> month or more for me. I do not have problems bringing up their website
> but I do notice that ICMP packet loss to them has been horrible the last
> month or so.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDauHNpbZvCIJx1bcRAnUQAJ9g/6HFPLH5XeKk14iiYxfNE+dsVQCfd7LJ
3ecLHsu0tJ8iDvzJJ9pOCaQ=
=r4me
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG
mailing list