classful routes redux
Paul Jakma
paul at clubi.ie
Thu Nov 3 06:49:12 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> er.. would this be a poor characterization of the IPv6 addressing
> architecture which is encouraged by the IETF and the various RIR
> members?
>
> class A == /32
> class B == /48
> class C == /56
> hostroute == /64
It's quite arbitrary though, unlike the old classful IPv4 divisions -
a matter of policy, not technology. The allocation sizes can and do
vary over both time (as policy changes, IIRC RIPE used to assign
/35s iirc, now it's /32) and between different RIRs.
A hostroute is /128 btw. ;)
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul at clubi.ie paul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
QOTD:
"Every morning I read the obituaries; if my name's not there,
I go to work."
More information about the NANOG
mailing list