classful routes redux
Fred Baker
fred at cisco.com
Thu Nov 3 00:03:43 UTC 2005
actually, no, I could compare a /48 to a class A.
On Nov 2, 2005, at 3:51 PM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>
>
> er.. would this be a poor characterization of the IPv6 addressing
> architecture which is encouraged by the IETF and the various RIR
> members?
>
> class A == /32
> class B == /48
> class C == /56
> hostroute == /64
>
> (and just think of all that spam than can originate from all those
> "loose" IP addresses in that /64 for your local SMTP server!!! Yummy)
>
> -- Oat Willie
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already
tomorrow in Australia." (Charles Schulz )
More information about the NANOG
mailing list