classful routes redux

Fred Baker fred at cisco.com
Thu Nov 3 00:03:43 UTC 2005


actually, no, I could compare a /48 to a class A.

On Nov 2, 2005, at 3:51 PM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

>
>
> er..  would this be a poor characterization of the IPv6 addressing
> architecture which is encouraged by the IETF and the various RIR
> members?
>
> 	class A ==  /32
> 	class B ==  /48
> 	class C ==  /56
> 	hostroute == /64
>
> (and just think of all that spam than can originate from all those
>  "loose" IP addresses in that /64 for your local SMTP server!!! Yummy)
>
> -- Oat Willie

--------------------------------------------------------------
"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already  
tomorrow in Australia." (Charles Schulz )




More information about the NANOG mailing list