Problem with peering between Gblx and WCG?
Josh Richards
jrichard at digitalwest.net
Wed Nov 2 19:38:19 UTC 2005
Yes, we had two tickets w/ WilTel related to this during the past week. We
initially noted a problem on Saturday (10/29). After escalation, they resolved
it sometime yesterday per my understanding. After confirming the problem did
not still exist from the GBLX route-server (telnet://route-server.gblx.net) we
turned our session back up with them yesterday evening. It appears alright
from our perspective at present.
My understanding was that they had a saturated OC12c between them @ LAX. Not
sure where else they inter-connect but it took several days for them to upgrade
that link. Not sure why they didn't shift traffic elsewhere while working on
the upgrade.
-jr
* Reeves, Rob <rreeves at arbinet.com> [20051102 17:42]:
>
> 1 ge4-1-0-226-1000M.ar4.PHX1.gblx.net (67.17.64.89) 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
> 2 so1-0-0-2488M.ar1.LAX2.gblx.net (67.17.67.169) 12 msec 8 msec 12 msec
> 3 lsanca3lcx1-pos13-2.wcg.net (64.200.142.193) 772 msec 796 msec 804 msec
> 4 anhmca1wcx2-pos5-0.wcg.net (64.200.140.69) [AS 7911] 804 msec 832 msec
> 852 msec
> 5 lsanca1wcx1-pos0-0-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.140.142) [AS 7911] 856 msec 988
> msec 1000 msec
>
> Would anyone happen to be aware of problems between Global Crossing and WCG
> in CA? We're hearing reports of intermittent latency across this link over
> the past three days.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Rob Reeves
> IP Network Engineer
> Arbinet
> 703-456-4172
> rreeves at arbinet.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
--
Josh Richards | Colocation Web Hosting Bandwidth
Digital West Networks | +1 805 781-9378 / www.digitalwest.net
San Luis Obispo, CA | AS14589 (Production) / AS29962 (R&D)
jrichard at digitalwest.net | DWNI - Making Internet Business Better
More information about the NANOG
mailing list