Problem with peering between Gblx and WCG?

Josh Richards jrichard at digitalwest.net
Wed Nov 2 19:38:19 UTC 2005


Yes, we had two tickets w/ WilTel related to this during the past week.  We 
initially noted a problem on Saturday (10/29).  After escalation, they resolved 
it sometime yesterday per my understanding.  After confirming the problem did
not still exist from the GBLX route-server (telnet://route-server.gblx.net) we 
turned our session back up with them yesterday evening.  It appears alright
from our perspective at present.

My understanding was that they had a saturated OC12c between them @ LAX.  Not
sure where else they inter-connect but it took several days for them to upgrade
that link.  Not sure why they didn't shift traffic elsewhere while working on 
the upgrade.

-jr


* Reeves, Rob <rreeves at arbinet.com> [20051102 17:42]:
> 
>   1 ge4-1-0-226-1000M.ar4.PHX1.gblx.net (67.17.64.89) 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
>   2 so1-0-0-2488M.ar1.LAX2.gblx.net (67.17.67.169) 12 msec 8 msec 12 msec
>   3 lsanca3lcx1-pos13-2.wcg.net (64.200.142.193) 772 msec 796 msec 804 msec
>   4 anhmca1wcx2-pos5-0.wcg.net (64.200.140.69) [AS 7911] 804 msec 832 msec
> 852 msec
>   5 lsanca1wcx1-pos0-0-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.140.142) [AS 7911] 856 msec 988
> msec 1000 msec
> 
> Would anyone happen to be aware of problems between Global Crossing and WCG
> in CA?  We're hearing reports of intermittent latency across this link over
> the past three days.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Rob Reeves
> IP Network Engineer
> Arbinet
> 703-456-4172
> rreeves at arbinet.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 

-- 
Josh Richards            | Colocation   Web Hosting   Bandwidth
Digital West Networks    | +1 805 781-9378 / www.digitalwest.net
San Luis Obispo, CA      | AS14589 (Production) / AS29962 (R&D)
jrichard at digitalwest.net | DWNI - Making Internet Business Better



More information about the NANOG mailing list