Equal access to content

Wed Nov 2 15:20:46 UTC 2005

>
> aol/google/content-provider-foo might provide exclusive content for a
> higher (or lower) price than to normal folks, it also might be  
> bitten by
> the lose of potential customers that way :( This sounds like a  
> business
> decision not a legislative one, eh?
>
>
>> Connection web site, should Disney be required to offer it to all  
>> Internet
>> users equally? The NFL offers its Sunday Ticket exclusively through
>> DirecTV? Or must the NFL offer the same content to every network?
>>
>>
>
> no one cares about football... Now, hockey! That's a sport that  
> everyone
> should get access to! :)
>
>

<insert tongue in cheek here>

I, for one, welcome Christopher Morrow, and Sean Donelan as my new  
monopoly overlords.  I'd like to remind him that as a trusted former  
associate/acquaintance, I can be helpful in rounding up others to  
toil in their underground sugar caves.

  </insert tongue in cheek here>

And yes, it has been done to death...  I am not proud...