[dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd)

Edward B. Dreger eddy+public+spam at noc.everquick.net
Wed May 4 13:52:16 UTC 2005


TF> Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 10:48:56 +0100
TF> From: Tony Finch

TF> Why would anyone use an anycast address as a client? Wouldn't it be
TF> simpler to make all client connections from the machine's unicast address?

Maybe, maybe not.

Take an anycast DNS provider that AXFR/IXFRs zones from its customers.
Notifying them of all anycast addresses and keeping ACLs up-to-date
isn't feasible.

The obvious answer is to have a couple hosts pull zones from unicasted
addresses.  However, this creates a few small targets... the question is
if DNS slaves would benefit sufficiently from increased splay to warrant
the additional implementation complexity.


Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc at brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq at intc.net -*- sam at everquick.net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.




More information about the NANOG mailing list