Please verify RFC1918 filters

Joe Maimon jmaimon at ttec.com
Sun Mar 27 16:44:11 UTC 2005




vijay gill wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 03:13:07PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
>>y'all might give us something pingable in that space so we can
>>do a primitive and incomplete test in a simple fashion.
>>
>>randy
>>
> 
> 
> try 172.128.1.1
> 
> 
> /vijay
> 
> 
Wouldnt 172.15.255.254 and 172.32.0.1 do better at helping to nail down 
improper filter issues?

Wont above miss detecting of

172.0.0.0 0.15-127.255.255
172.16.0.0 0.31-63.255.255

while it will catch only

172.0.0.0 0.255.255.255

(disregarding other possible permutations)
?

Also perhaps a traceroute http web site there would be nice also.

Perhaps that is all more trouble than its worth.....






More information about the NANOG mailing list