Please verify RFC1918 filters
Joe Maimon
jmaimon at ttec.com
Sun Mar 27 16:44:11 UTC 2005
vijay gill wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 03:13:07PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>>y'all might give us something pingable in that space so we can
>>do a primitive and incomplete test in a simple fashion.
>>
>>randy
>>
>
>
> try 172.128.1.1
>
>
> /vijay
>
>
Wouldnt 172.15.255.254 and 172.32.0.1 do better at helping to nail down
improper filter issues?
Wont above miss detecting of
172.0.0.0 0.15-127.255.255
172.16.0.0 0.31-63.255.255
while it will catch only
172.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
(disregarding other possible permutations)
?
Also perhaps a traceroute http web site there would be nice also.
Perhaps that is all more trouble than its worth.....
More information about the NANOG
mailing list