public accessible snmp devices?

• Previous message (by thread): public accessible snmp devices?
• Next message (by thread): public accessible snmp devices?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 09:12 -0800, JC Dill wrote:
> The important thing is to determine which RFCs are being implemented, 
> and why.
> 
> <http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=2756>

:-)

Not that I am defending Juniper, but it seems to me that their response
"that the RFC wasn’t serious" is an indicator that they did in fact get
the "joke", however they didn't want to reply in a jovial fashion.

-Jim P.

• Previous message (by thread): public accessible snmp devices?
• Next message (by thread): public accessible snmp devices?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]