Heads up: Long AS-sets announced in the next few days

Thu Mar 3 19:19:24 UTC 2005

On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 13:51 -0500, Blaine Christian wrote:

>And, of course, the RPSEC working group draft that is supposed to target the
>BGP requirements for those proposed systems is...
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rpsec-bgpsecrec-01.txt
>
>The folks who worked on S-BGP and SO-BGP participated in it's creation (as
>well as several operators).   Please note that there are more than just two
>proposed mechanisms for securing BGP.  The two mentioned above are just the
>most popular <grin>.

Thanks for the new reading material, I had not seen that one yet...
*print* will be a nice read

(hmmm, actually I should swear at you for even more reading material,
for which I have no time, oh well :)

Greets,
 Jeroen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20050303/70f0dbaa/attachment.sig>