More on Vonage service disruptions...
Greg Boehnlein
damin at nacs.net
Thu Mar 3 03:15:48 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
> Ah, and therein lies the rub.
>
> Any sort of QoS frob that is implemented for VoIP
> (or any other traffic for that matter) _must_ be
> truly honored end-to-end, and at every intermediate
> hop in between, for it to be "guaranteed" -- otherwise
> when traffic that you may designate as "higher quality"
> is handed off to another administrative domain that
> does not honor your traffic classifications, all bets
> are off.
>
> If you do not "own" the end-to-end network
> infrastructure, there is no way to guarantee any
> preferential handling of any particular subset of
> traffic.
So, set your Rate-Limiting of SIP traffic to 1 packet per second for the
network that YOU control and then offer your VoIP subscribers a different
QOS profile at a higher cost.
Bingo, problem solved. The economy will work itself out.
--
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
KP-216-121-ST
More information about the NANOG
mailing list