AOL scomp
Jim Segrave
jes at nl.demon.net
Tue Mar 1 13:17:17 UTC 2005
On Thu 24 Feb 2005 (12:40 -0500), Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:28:58 EST, Matt Taber said:
> > It's too bad that about 1/3 of the reported mails are valid opt-in lists.
>
> Proof that any network management or security or anti-spam scheme that implies
> end users with functional neurons is doomed from the get-go.
>
I don't understand this complaint - we process AOL TOS Notifications
daily and I find perhaps 1 in a hundred or so are not valid complaints.
--
Jim Segrave jes at nl.demon.net
More information about the NANOG
mailing list