public accessible snmp devices?

Jim Popovitch jimpop at
Sun Mar 6 17:55:11 UTC 2005

On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 09:12 -0800, JC Dill wrote:
> The important thing is to determine which RFCs are being implemented, 
> and why.
> <>


Not that I am defending Juniper, but it seems to me that their response
"that the RFC wasn’t serious" is an indicator that they did in fact get
the "joke", however they didn't want to reply in a jovial fashion.

-Jim P.

More information about the NANOG mailing list