public accessible snmp devices?
jimpop at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 6 17:55:11 UTC 2005
On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 09:12 -0800, JC Dill wrote:
> The important thing is to determine which RFCs are being implemented,
> and why.
Not that I am defending Juniper, but it seems to me that their response
"that the RFC wasn’t serious" is an indicator that they did in fact get
the "joke", however they didn't want to reply in a jovial fashion.
More information about the NANOG