Is my BIND Server's Cache Poisioned ?

Fergie (Paul Ferguson) fergdawg at netzero.net
Thu Jun 30 12:35:24 UTC 2005



Maybe Congress uncovered that mystery in their IPv6 hearings. ;-)

http://www.techweb.com/wire/ebiz/164903883

- ferg


-- "william(at)elan.net" <william at elan.net> wrote:


On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Mark Andrews wrote:

> 	No.  These are just a mis-configured zones.
>
> 	hangzhou.gov.cn only has glue records for the nameservers.
> 	zpepc.com.cn has CNAMEs for the nameservers.
>
> 	Both of these misconfigurations are visible to nameservers
> 	that are IPv6 aware.  Nameservers that are not IPv6 aware
> 	are not likely to make the queries that make these
> 	misconfigurations visible.

Why would these dns misconfigurations be visible only to IPV6-aware servers?

[snip]

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg at netzero.net or fergdawg at sbcglobal.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/



More information about the NANOG mailing list