Is my BIND Server's Cache Poisioned ?
Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
fergdawg at netzero.net
Thu Jun 30 12:35:24 UTC 2005
Maybe Congress uncovered that mystery in their IPv6 hearings. ;-)
http://www.techweb.com/wire/ebiz/164903883
- ferg
-- "william(at)elan.net" <william at elan.net> wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Mark Andrews wrote:
> No. These are just a mis-configured zones.
>
> hangzhou.gov.cn only has glue records for the nameservers.
> zpepc.com.cn has CNAMEs for the nameservers.
>
> Both of these misconfigurations are visible to nameservers
> that are IPv6 aware. Nameservers that are not IPv6 aware
> are not likely to make the queries that make these
> misconfigurations visible.
Why would these dns misconfigurations be visible only to IPV6-aware servers?
[snip]
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg at netzero.net or fergdawg at sbcglobal.net
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
More information about the NANOG
mailing list