OSPF -vs- ISIS

Abhishek Verma abhishekv.verma at gmail.com
Mon Jun 27 09:12:04 UTC 2005


Hi Manav,

Excellent Document!

I see that this document has expired. Are you folks thinking of
respinning a copy of this draft?

Thanks,
Abhishek

On 6/23/05, Manav Bhatia <manav at riverstonenet.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> We wrote a draft some time back comparing the two protocols ISIS and OSPF.
> It should address some of your doubts and concerns.
> 
> Here's a pointer to my local copy:
> 
> http://geocities.com/mnvbhatia/draft-bhatia-manral-diff-isis-ospf-00.txt
> 
> Thanks,
> Manav
> 
> !> -----Original Message-----
> !> From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu]
> !> On Behalf Of Dan Evans
> !> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 7:35 PM
> !> To: nanog at merit.edu
> !> Subject: OSPF -vs- ISIS
> !>
> !>
> !> All,
> !>
> !> Can anyone point me to information on what the top N service
> !> providers
> !> are using for their IGP? I'm trying to build a case for
> !> switching from
> !> OSPF to IS-IS. Those on this list who are currently running IS-IS, do
> !> you find better scalability and stability running IS-IS than OSPF? I
> !> understand that this question is a lot more complex than a simple yes
> !> or no since factors like design and routing policy will certainly
> !> affect the protocols behavior.
> !>
> !> Any insights or experiences that you can share would be most helpful.
> !>
> !> Thanks,
> !>
> !> Daniel Evans
> !> Alltel Communications
> !>
> !>
> 
> 
> 


-- 

--
Class of 2004
Institute of Technology, BHU
Varanasi, India



More information about the NANOG mailing list