[NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution
Hannigan, Martin
hannigan at verisign.com
Tue Jun 21 02:13:17 UTC 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vijay gill [mailto:vgill at vijaygill.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 9:06 PM
> To: Hannigan, Martin
> Cc: Daniel Golding; nanog at merit.edu; nanog-support at merit.edu
> Subject: Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution
>
>
> Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>
> >
> > It shouldn't be complicated. I think "members" are looking
> > for Operator experience. I don't think it's too hard to make that
> > easily discernable as long as it's fair.
>
> Members aren't looking for Operator experience (sic). Members are
> looking for talks that do not suck.
>
(sic) is a matter of interpretation, and, you already said the talks
suck. The PC said they don't get enough talks. Some of the talks are
going to be filler.
-M<
More information about the NANOG
mailing list